AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTING CONDITIONAL SENTENCES (A Case Study at the Eleventh Grade of SMAN Modal Bangsa Arun)

Record Detail

Skripsi

AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTING CONDITIONAL SENTENCES (A Case Study at the Eleventh Grade of SMAN Modal Bangsa Arun)

XML

This thesis is entitled “An Error Analysis in Constructing Conditional Sentences
(A Qualitative Research at The Eleventh Grade of SMAN Modal Bangsa Arun)”. Conditional sentences are very essential to be mastered by the students refers to
curriculum 2013. However, it is found that the eleventh grade students of SMAN
Modal Bangsa Arun had lack of idea and concept of conditional sentences. It
caused problem in identifying and constructing conditional sentences. The
purposes of this research are (1) to find out what types of errors occur during
constructing conditional sentences in Surface Strategy Taxonomy, and (2) to find
out what factors cause the errors in constructing conditional sentences. Research
design applied in this research was qualitative method and the type was document
analysis. Twelve students were chosen as sampling by purposive-intensity
sampling. Documentation and indepth interview were obtained to find types and
causes of errors occur during constructing conditional sentences in descriptive
explanation. It is found that misformation, omission, addition, and misordering
errors are the types of errors in constructing conditional sentences. Misformation
dominated the numbers of errors that students misused main verb and auxiliary
verb (do/does/did/had) refers to the formulas of conditional sentences. Omission
errors were also in the main verb and auxiliary verb (do/does/did/had). Addition
errors were in auxiliary verb (have) and misordering errors were in misplacement
of “not” in negative sentences. Document analysis shown students with high level
made 92 errors which 56 errors (60,86%) were categorized as misformation
errors, 31 errors (33,69%) were categorized as omissions errors, 3 errors (3,26%)
errors were categorized as addition errors, and 2 errors (2,17%) were categorized
as misordering errors. Students with middle level made 105 errors which 69 errors
(65,71%) were categorized as misformation errors, 29 errors (27,61%) were
categorized as omission errors, 4 errors (3,80%) were categorized as addition
errors, and 3 errors (2,85%) were categorized as misordering errors. Students with
low level made 121 errors which 79 errors (65,28%) were categorized as
misformation errors, 32 errors (26,44% were categorized as omission errors, 8
errors (6,61%) were categorized as addition errors, and 2 errors (1,6%) were
categorized as misordering errors. This finding shows that level of students related
to students’ ability in identifying and constructing conditional sentences. The
result of interview showed that students had carelessness over English lesson,
been influenced by their native language, and failed in transferring their native
language to English as the causes of their errors. The sources of errors were
indicated from context of learning and interlingual transfer. It is suggested that
students should repeat the material about basic tenses and conditional sentences,
pay attention when the teacher explains, making colorful note, share and do the
discussion with their friends. It is also suggested to the teacher to emphasize the
use of bare verb and auxiliary verb, part of speech that must be present, correct
order of part of speech, warm up the class, and add extra meeting to help students
fully understand about the material.


Detail Information

Penulis
ASSYIFA FARHAINI - Personal Name
NIP/NIDN/NIM 142308319
Edition
Language
English
Publisher FTIK-TEN : IAIN Lhokseumawe.,
Edition
Subject(s)
No Panggil
TEN

BACA FULLTEX

LOADING LIST...



Information


RECORD DETAIL


Back To Previous  XML Detail